‘Brussels Process’ as antidote to Orwellian ‘Cairo Declaration of Human Rights’

International Civil Liberties Alliance

The following video is from the International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) side event at the recent Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) meeting in Warsaw.

ICLA Chairman Alain Wagner highlights the dangers of the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam which in reality subverts human rights, asserting shariah law’s dominance in human affairs.  Wagner draws the essential distinctions between the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Cairo declaration; only one actually serves to protect human rights as they are traditionally understood in the West.

Longtime free speech campaigner Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff presents the Brussels Process as the antidote to the anti-free speech and anti freedom initiatives that Governments are increasingly resorting to.

The Brussels Process aims to:

  1. Educate and inform the public to ensure that laws that undermine our freedoms are repeals and laws that enhance it are enacted.
  2. Demonstrate that sharia compliance is against human rights and should not be embraced when human rights decisions are being made.
  3. Encourage human rights practitioners to consider rulings such as that made by the European Court of Human Rights in 2003 which said that Sharia is incompatible with democracy.
  4. Create a framework for individuals and organisations to stand up and protect liberty from the sharia threat.

 Video courtesy MRC-TV:

 

 

 

Center for Security Policy

Please Share: