Would you vote for world government?

In twelve days, global elitists will put world government on steroids. The perpetrators don’t want us to know it, but that’s the purpose of the upcoming “Summit of the Future” and the accord it is supposed to adopt, dubbed the “Pact for the Future.”

Rather than openly doing so by voting to revise the UN Charter, the idea is to launch a “process” to be conducted largely behind closed doors. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, however, has let slip that process’ goal – namely, granting him authority unilaterally to declare and dictate the responses to emergencies caused by any of a number of so-called “complex global shocks.” That “fundamental transformation” would amount to world government.

Tonight’s presidential debate affords an opportunity to expose what’s afoot and ask American voters whether they want “global governance” or the limited, representative and accountable kind guaranteed by our Constitution.

This is Frank Gaffney.