Exposed: Chinese Psyops Against America – One Hell Of A Success

Originally published by And Magazine

Some stories have a shelf-life of maybe a few hours. Others are still relevant after a year or many years have passed. This one was written a year ago, but it’s still fresh as a daisy. Thank you Eric Swalwell.

Revelations about Congressman Swalwell – a stalwart on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee – and his female Chinese “friend” are entertaining – and given his self-righteous hectoring of President Trump for supposedly colluding with Russians, the words “karma” and “schadenfreude” come to mind. But Swalwell is just a reminder that Americans have been getting into bed with the Chinese – literally and figuratively – for a good long while now. And somehow it’s the Chinese who come out on top.

One marvels at what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has accomplished. And no, it’s not the Shenzhen skyscrapers or the new Beijing airport. Rather, the CCP has pulled off the most successful psychological operations campaign in history over the last four decades. It managed to neuter the United States – the only country that might have prevented it from building an economy and a military able to challenge and conceivably defeat the Americans.

And it didn’t have to fire a shot. More impressive, it got the Americans to assist and even fund the effort – convinced that the PRC was unthreatening (or could be made so), indispensable, and a gold mine. The Chinese didn’t exactly hide their intentions. One only had to pay attention – and take Beijing at its word.

Like all good psyops campaigns, the Communists knew their target’s vulnerabilities. They capitalized on American avarice, ignorance, naiveté, vanity, and hubris. And Beijing attacked on a broad front – successfully manipulating American business and Wall Street, government officials and the political class, academia, and even U.S. military leaders.

American industry was easy – given the hypnotic allure of Chinese money and the vast Chinese market. One can hardly name a major American company that stayed out of the China market – despite well-known risks.
Motorola – once a top American company – got in early and did everything right. But it was just committing suicide. Boeing, Apple, Pratt and Whitney, Microsoft, Tesla and many others remain – naively expecting a different outcome.

The psychological dependence is such that when China (aka the People’s Republic of China, or PRC) threatens market access, American corporations – and basketball players – prostrate themselves.

Wall Street was an even easier target. It‘s still falling over itself to get into China– with other people’s money of course. The bankers get their cut no matter what happens. Indeed, financial luminaries such as Henry Paulson (former head of Goldman Sachs and (former) U.S. Treasury Secretary) and Stephen Schwartzman of Blackstone seem more committed to the PRC than are the Chinese elites spiriting their own money out of the country as fast as they can.

Silicon Valley? (aka “Big Tech”) Never saw Chinese money it didn’t like.

And willfully blind U.S. securities regulators convinced themselves that Chinese companies deserve less scrutiny when listing on U.S. exchanges than do American companies.

Money works with Americans. The CCP didn’t even have to break a sweat.
Cutting a wide swath through the U.S. political class. Beijing was equally successful in Washington – making a clean sweep of U.S. administrations until Trump came along.

Of course, each “had its reasons.”

• President Obama was keen to “deescalate” regardless of Chinese provocations or broken promises. “Obamacare”was more important.
• George Bush was busy with Iraq and Afghanistan and anyway lacked the stomach for challenging the PRC – as his treatment of Taiwan revealed.
• The Clintons? The Chinese just bought them off. Not exactly difficult.
• George H.W. Bush thought he “knew” the CCP – having lived in Beijing for 15 whole months – so he comforted the CCP after it massacred thousands of its citizens at Tiananmen Square.
• Even Ronald Reagan who brought down the Soviet Union – and hated communism – listened to his too clever by half advisors – handing over military technology to the PRC to “split” the Chinese from the Russians.
• Jimmy Carter? He threw away Taiwan without ever explaining just why. Beijing presumably didn’t ask.
• And Richard Nixon started it all – begging the PRC for a relationship when it should have been the other way around. His biggest mistake? Listening to a former Ivy League professor who knew little about China, and who the Chinese have played masterfully ever since.

And, at the “working” level in D.C. China has found many officials keen to accommodate Beijing. All in the name of “statesmanship.” And all are convinced they alone know China and how to handle the Chinese – especially if they speak some Chinese. The Communists gladly let them think so.

The Obama administration’s Asia policy director was in Hong Kong last year – advising American businessmen that to make money in China they should align themselves with Xi Jinping’s interests. Some claim that’s what he did when on the U.S. Government payroll.

Another prominent former official who nearly got the State Department’s top Asia job in 2018 advised a Shanghai audience that included Chinese officials to wait out Mr. Trump until more accommodating people take over.

And it was easy pickings for the Chinese over on Capitol Hill.

Powerful Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein was curiously accommodating on the PRC for decades. Even musing: “I sometimes say that in my last life maybe I was Chinese.” Meanwhile, her husband made a bundle from Chinese business dealings. She also had a Chinese spy as her chauffeur for a couple decades.

The Republicans were equally “subvertable.” Senator Mitch McConnell having family connections to Chinese money – a lot of it.

Former Vice President and then presidential candidate, Joe Biden declared there’s nothing to worry about from China. Maybe the Chinese government’s interest in his son’s investment company had more to do with manipulating the Vice President than with Hunter Biden’s financial brilliance? And some people say Joe himself was angling for a piece of the action.

Former legislators are also juicy targets for the PRC.

Joseph Lieberman – once the conscience of the U.S. Senate signed up to lobby on behalf of Chinese telecom firm ZTE last year. Ex-Senator and conservative, Republican David Vitter – has become a shill for Hikvision USA – the American branch of the Chinese company whose equipment is a backbone of the PRC’s surveillance state – and complicit in the imprisonment of a million Uighurs.

The list goes on. Ex-Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, a former Senator from Maine and a model of “Down East” sensibility, runs a consulting firm pushing business with the PRC. He just hired another ex-Defense Secretary, retired Marine General James Mattis. Say it ain’t so. “About those Chinese concentration camps and PLA threats to kill American servicemen by the thousands, General?”

Looking on the bright side…the Americans are usually just doing it for the money – not the ideology.

And believe it or not, things could be worse. There have always been officials and legislators in Washington fighting a holding action – starting with the Taiwan Relations Act in 1979 – to keep China’s agents and “useful idiots” from completely giving away the game.

U.S. Media – Missing in Action

American media has gone quiet. It gladly savages Russia and Putin, but when it comes to China it’s “kid gloves” treatment as most major media companies have been keen to not offend Beijing. There are good reporters and columnists, but there’s also the other kind. Tom Friedman has been singing Beijing’s praises for years and once said he’d like to be the Chinese government for a day so he could fix America. Indeed.

Newspapers print PRC government talking points uncritically as often as not – and many accepted Chinese paid propaganda – as in the Washington Post’s China Daily insert – until the shame got to be too much. Some still take the cash, however. Bloomberg killed a well-researched story in 2013 on CCP leadership corruption – afraid of damaging it’s other moneymaking operations in the PRC.

And consider the fentanyl epidemic that is killing more Americans each year than died during the entire Iraq and Afghanistan post-9/11 wars. American media rarely mention that China is the source of most of the drugs – and could turn it off in a minute.

Beijing benefitted from U.S. administrations being too afraid to challenge Chinese restrictions and harassment of American reporters. And this while Chinese reporters and media companies operated freely in the U.S.

Then Americans convinced themselves they needed the PRC’s help with climate change, transnational crime, and North Korea – even though the help never came. It’s not Beijing’s fault if Americans are gullible.

With a few exceptions, Hollywood practically gives the word “whoredom” a bad name. Money has always been king, but there’s so much Chinese money around that patriotism has been declared persona non grata – along with “human rights.”

As for American universities, Beijing correctly calculated the price of academia’s principles: That’s “x number” of Chinese students paying full tuition. A visa, a business class ticket, and a seminar invitation to the PRC works well too – as does a nice under the table stipend to help out the PRC with some innocent research.

The Washington think-tanks have always been rattling the tin cup for money – but some have fallen prey – willingly in most cases – to PRC blandishments and cash. They of course claim they are still objective. But read carefully and it’s more often an attempt to sound objective while not offending Beijing. A D.C. think-tanker noted that “Taiwan gets better treatment from the PRC when Beijing’s relations with Washington are smoother.” In other words, give the CCP what it wants and it’ll strangle Taiwan more slowly. His advice to Taipei: “Work something out with Beijing.” His unspoken advice: Go quietly to your fate.

Do-gooder NGO’s such as Greenpeace? Intimidated, speechless, and cowering while China destroys South China Sea reefs, vacuums the oceans of fish, and builds even more coal-fired energy plants. Bother the Chinese and they might shoot you. The Americans won’t.

But how about the U.S. military – the one organization that is supposed to be clear-sighted about threats to the nation and defending against them. China has done rather well. Until recently – say, a year or two ago – the U.S. military leadership largely ignored the Chinese military build-up – even refusing to refer to the PRC as an adversary. The military ruling class was even keen to help the PLA improve and professionalize itself. One often heard the cliché: “A strong China is a good thing.”

And PACOM commanders – with rare exceptions – gladly appeased China out of limitless gullibility, a desire to curry favor with the White House, or simply not being very bright. One can’t blame the PRC for taking advantage.

And more than a few senior officers happily retire and join the Track 2 dialogue racket of business class travel, five star hotel junkets, and lavish banquets in the PRC.

But certainly, younger officers know the score? Maybe not. Too many young officers of all services know little history and even seem to lack critical thinking ability. Their understanding of China is based on Graham Allison’s book and the movie Kung Fu Panda.

Everything described here is the result of conscious decisions by well-educated, pedigreed Americans. Their tendency to explain away Chinese behavior is only surpassed by skill at explaining away their own behavior.

And it’s neat, pleasing sophistry.

The argument goes something like this: What I’m doing is okay since it will lead to China liberalizing and buying into the “rules based order.” And the more I do the more likely this will happen. The alternative is thermo-nuclear war. And if I make some money or get a promotion in the process, that’s a “win-win.”

Seachange?

The Trump administration is the first in decades to challenge China. But does this indicate a “sea change” that will roll back Chinese psyops successes? Don’t bet on it.

The U.S. financial industry is still hot for the China market as is too much of the U.S. business community. The American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong has recently been keen to avoid being mistaken for Americans and is giving the word “groveling” a bad name.

And just look at the guest list of former-Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg’s New Economy Forum held in Beijing recently. It’s business, finance, and government heavy hitters – and all happy to pose for a picture with Xi Xinping. Bloomberg himself even declared Xi is not a dictator. Really?

And it’s not just the financiers and businessmen. Former U.S. government officials, presumably aiming for sinecures in a new administration, advised Hong Kongers to take their medicine and accept enslavement. One of them warned the Trump administration to “do no harm” when it comes to Hong Kong. In other words, “don’t do anything China won’t like.”

The Mongols were famous for their psychological operations as they swept through Russia and into Eastern Europe in the 13th century. But they had to throw a few headless bodies over the town wall and give residents a choice: “surrender now or everyone dies tomorrow.”

The Chinese Communists have had it easier. Some combination of money, flattery, and a ten-course dinner is usually all that’s needed with Americans.
You’d think they would know they are being played. Perhaps. But maybe they just can’t imagine it or just don’t care.

Regardless, sometimes you have to step back in awe at what the Chinese have gotten the Americans to do to themselves.

Indeed, back in the 1950’s after the CCP takeover, it was popular to ask “Who lost China?” These days, maybe it’s best to ask: “Who lost the U.S.?” The answer: a lot of people and they all should have known better.