Le Moment Kasparov: Democratic Champion to be Honored as his Forecast of Soviet Center’s Demise is Fulfilled

(Washington, D.C.): With the financial
collapse of a reconfigured Moscow center
now imminent and the Group of Seven
nations scrambling to stitch together a
Gorbachev rescue package, World Chess
Champion and master strategist Garry
Kasparov will be delivering a major
address on Wednesday, 20 November, on the
outlook for the former Soviet Union.

The Center for Security Policy will be
honoring Kasparov at a black-tie gala at
the ANA Westin Hotel as the second
recipient of the Center’s annual ‘Keeper
of the Flame’ award. (Last year’s
recipient was former U.S. Secretary of
Defense Caspar Weinberger.)

Kasparov has long urged the West to
cease its massive overinvestment in
Mikhail Gorbachev and the Soviet central
authorities in favor of real
democratic and free market forces taking
root at the republic and local levels.
Recent events establishing Moscow
center’s utter bankruptcy —
literally and figuratively
— have
more than validated his advice and
that of the Center for Security Policy

on this score:

  • In the past few days, senior
    Soviet officials have confirmed
    that Moscow’s external
    debt exceeds $81 billion
    .
    While some in the West continue
    to low-ball Soviet indebtedness
    (e.g., Germany’s Deutsche Bank
    claims it is only about $56 to 60
    billion), it has been evident for
    years that the true amount was
    significantly higher. Although
    the Russian Republic has pledged
    to repay past Soviet
    indebtedness, it has announced
    that it will not honor
    any new debts incurred
    by the Kremlin after 15 November
    .
  • Grigory Yavlinsky, a Gorbachev
    protege appointed to the
    reconfigured center’s post of
    deputy chairman of the Committee
    for the Management of the
    National Economy, revealed on 14
    November that [the Soviet Bank
    for Foreign Economic Affairs, Vneshekonombank]
    has continued to function only by
    plundering some $4 billion in
    hard currency accounts held by
    Soviet enterprises and
    individuals
    . Press
    reports indicate that even foreign
    depositors’ holdings have been
    raided or encumbered.
  • Vneshekonombank — or V-bank —
    is the central Soviet banking
    institution charged with the
    responsibility for managing the
    vast majority of Moscow’s
    international financial
    transactions and borrowings; the
    G-7 and other lenders have
    traditionally regarded it as the
    ultimate guarantor of Soviet debt
    obligations. Unfortunately for
    such creditors, the
    Yavlinsky disclosure must
    decimate
    any residual
    confidence
    the Western
    financial community or Soviet
    public might place in
    Vneshekonombank
    .
    Ironically, this latest blow
    comes at the very moment that
    Western governments are looking
    to V-bank as the obligor for
    total Soviet hard currency
    indebtedness and the principal
    coordinating body for the
    upcoming Soviet debt rescheduling
    and for most “new
    money” flows.
  • The Yavlinsky report also
    revealed that Moscow
    center’s scheduled debt
    repayments in 1992 and 1993 (as
    much as $20 billion annually)
    would absorb approximately 100
    percent of all Soviet hard
    currency income during this
    period
    . The report
    averred that the Soviet Union has
    been able to make its debt
    repayment obligations in recent
    years only by exhausting
    strategic gold reserves.
  • Saudi Arabia, South
    Korea, and Italy have reportedly
    suspended further loan
    disbursements to the Soviet Union

    because of the unacceptable level
    of risk involved in any further
    business with Moscow center.
    Meanwhile, COFACE — the
    French government’s export credit
    agency — has recently declined
    to cover 100 percent of the
    credit risk on a $287 million
    Franco-Soviet oil-for-sugar swap
    arrangement
    . As such an
    absolute taxpayer-underwritten
    arrangement is now effectively
    required for the Soviet market,
    COFACE’s decision to guarantee no
    more than 90 percent of the
    transaction amount will most
    likely result in the project’s
    collapse.
  • The Kohl government and Germany’s
    leading commercial banker,
    Deutsche Bank chief executive,
    Hilmar Kopper, are engaged in
    open warfare over the extent and
    implications of the Soviet
    financial crisis. Kopper calls
    the Soviet Union’s hard currency
    shortfalls “extremely
    acute” and predicts that Western
    aid will be too late to prevent a
    Soviet default
    . For his
    part, Foreign Minister
    Hans-Dietrich Genscher — an
    unreconstructed apologist for
    Soviet totalitarianism —
    disputes Kopper’s claims,
    labeling the assertions
    “dangerous and not
    objective” according to the
    15 November New York Times.
  • Also on 15 November, Russian
    President Boris Yeltsin took
    control of the production and
    distribution of — and the
    hard currency revenues associated
    with
    — oil, diamonds, gold
    and other precious metals on
    Russian territory
    . His
    decree announcing a review of all
    existing oil contracts, with the
    possibility of curtailing some
    (if not all) oil exports, has
    substantially heightened
    anxieties in both the Western oil
    and credit markets. On 17
    November, Yeltsin extended that
    control to include all remaining
    structures of the Soviet finance
    ministry, including its authority
    to control hard currency flows.

This cavalcade of debilitating
financial developments must clearly
render dead-on-arrival
any further attempt by President Bush to
certify that the former Soviet Union is
creditworthy and thus eligible for
additional U.S. taxpayer-underwritten
credit guarantees or investment insurance

(read, Overseas Private Investment
Corporation coverage). It also validates
Garry Kasparov’s visionary arguments that
Western governments and banks still
clinging to the authority of the Soviet
State Bank (Gosbank) and Bank for Foreign
Economic Affairs are not only helping to
prop up the totally discredited Soviet
central authorities but, in so doing,
placing their taxpayers or
shareholders/depositors squarely in
harm’s way.

Center for Security Policy

Please Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *