Meltdown In Armenia Demands Reassessment, Redirection Of U.S. Policy In The Caspian Basin

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

(Washington, D.C.): The apparent theft
of the election in Armenia by a
government increasingly indifferent to
the rights of its own people and aligned
with Moscow and Tehran should be a
wake-up call for policy-makers in
Washington and elsewhere in the West:
While the handwriting has been on the
wall for many months, it is now
indisputably clear that an imbalanced
U.S. policy toward the Caspian Basin has
done immense damage to American strategic
and economic interests — some of which
may be irreparable. The United States
simply cannot any longer afford to
accommodate a domestic constituency
determined to give preferential treatment
to Armenia at the expense of a secular,
Western-oriented Muslim Azerbaijan that
is America’s natural partner in the
region.

As the attached
editorial
published in today’s Washington
Post
makes clear, the Armenian
government of Levon Ter-Petrossian has
mutated into an increasingly
authoritarian and despotic regime:

“…More than a year ago,
[Ter-Petrossian] started down the
slope toward rule by Diktat,
banning a major opposition party and
gagging much of the press.
Parliamentary elections last year
were widely condemned for violations
of fairness….According to
international observers, the vote [in
the just-completed presidential
election] was marred by ‘significant
and serious breaches in the
law’…leaving the legitimacy of
[Ter-Petrossian’s] victory in strong
doubt.”

Worse yet, the Armenian government
employed brutal repression to silence
legitimate, peaceful protests of
Ter-Petrossian’s election fraud. As the Post
put it: “…The incumbent has sent
troops and tanks into the capital,
imposing a virtual state of emergency.
Opposition deputies have been beaten and
kicked out of parliament. Troops have
stormed into opposition party
headquarters and shut them down.”

That this is occurring in a country
that receives “more U.S. aid per
capita than any other country besides
Israel” (1)
and that has just received
congressional approval of a further gift
of $95 million (2)
from unwitting American taxpayers
(in
addition to the roughly $500 million
already disbursed to Armenia in past
years) is reprehensible. Insult is added
to injury by what even a newspaper like
the Washington Post, which is
reflexively sympathetic to U.S.
diplomatic sensibilities, called “a
mealy-mouthed American response” to
Ter-Petrossian’s sacking of his nation’s
fledgling democracy.

Reckless Endangerment of
U.S. Interests

The gravity of the strategic mistake
being made by U.S. policy-makers towards
key countries of the Caspian Basin is
highlighted in a newly-released summary
of a Roundtable Discussion sponsored last
spring by the William J. Casey Institute
of the Center for Security Policy. Held
on 13 March 1996 in Washington, the
Roundtable examined the enormous
strategic and economic implications of
the approximately 200 billion barrels of
oil believed to be recoverable from the
Caspian Sea region — a quantity larger
than the combined reserves of the North
Sea and the North Slope of Alaska. More
than sixty participants took part in the
half-day conference, including
representatives of the Departments of
Defense, State and Energy, diplomats,
industry experts, senior congressional
staff and members of the press. The three
lead discussants during the symposium
were:

  • Senator Jon Kyl,
    Republican of Arizona — a member
    of the Center’s Board of Advisors
    and recipient of its prestigious
    1994 “Keeper of the
    Flame” award who serves on
    the Senate’s Energy and National
    Resources and Intelligence
    Committees — who provided a
    valuable overview of the
    strategic implications of the
    Caspian Basin’s vast oil
    reserves;
  • Dr. T. Don Stacy
    — the Chairman and President of
    Amoco Eurasia Petroleum
    Corporation — who gave a
    detailed briefing on the physical
    location, size and geo-political
    complexities associated with
    bringing to market what he
    characterized as potentially the
    world’s second largest oil
    reserves; and
  • Hon. Richard Perle
    — the former Assistant Secretary
    of Defense for International
    Security Policy who argued that
    America has interests virtually
    everywhere around the globe, in
    particular in such areas as the
    Caspian Sea, where secular
    governments like that of
    Azerbaijan are seeking to emerge
    from decades of Communist misrule
    and aspiring to become integral
    elements of the Western financial
    and trading systems.

To receive a copy
of the seven-page summary
of this
important Roundtable Discussion, please
contact the Center.

The Bottom Line

Against this strategic backdrop, the
meltdown of any pretense of democracy in
Armenia must occasion an immediate U.S.
policy course-correction toward the
nations of the Caspian Basin. Elements of
such a course-correction should include
the following:

  • An immediate White House
    invitation to President Heydar
    Aliyev of Azerbaijan to meet with
    President Clinton in Washington,
    D.C. to consolidate U.S.
    strategic and investment
    interests in the region.
  • The convening of hearings in both
    the Senate and House — ideally
    in both the respective energy and
    foreign affairs committees — to
    increase congressional and public
    awareness of the opportunities
    and stakes involved in bringing
    Caspian oil to international
    markets on an accelerated basis
    while thwarting Russian and
    Iranian efforts to contest and
    control such export activities.
  • Towards this end, as well, the
    dispatch of congressional
    delegations to the region —
    including Azerbaijan.
  • The immediate revocation of
    Section 907 as a necessary
    first-step toward establishing a
    genuinely balanced U.S. policy
    toward the region.
    (Interestingly, this Section is
    practically unique insofar as it
    fails to provide the President
    the latitude to waive its
    strictures on the grounds of
    national security or other vital
    interests.)

– 30 –

1. See on this
point Caspian Watch #4:
House-Senate Conference Must Strike
Proper Balance for American Interests
,
(No. 96-D 85,
17 September 1996).

2. Fortunately,
Congress narrowly rejected an effort that
would have compounded the misbegotten
favoritism shown Armenia at Azerbaijan’s
expense enshrined in Section 907 of the
Freedom Support Act of 1992, which bars any
direct U.S. humanitarian or other
assistance flows to Azerbaijan. The
latest effort took the form of an
amendment offered by Rep. John Porter
(R-IL) to the FY1997 foreign operations
appropriations bill, a measure that was
rejected in conference committee
following the publication of Caspian
Watch #4
.

Center for Security Policy

Please Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *